久缠的痛经与脱发，竟是“隐形消耗”的代价******
医案——小敏，21 岁，经行腹痛半年余，伴有脱发、汗多
小敏今年21岁，是一位在读的设计专业大学生。这个学期，她准备毕业实习，要设计一系列作品，由于经常熬夜，每天都与冰咖啡奶茶打交道。然而，在半年前，她每次例假都会痛经，有时还需要服用止痛药。尤其是今年入冬以来，每次来例假都不得不请病假，只因痛得直不起腰板。近来她还掉头发严重，出汗也很多，常手脚冰凉，尤其是膝盖以下就像被冰水浸泡，多穿也不觉得暖和。她还经常觉得腹部胀满。上一次来例假时有很多血块，血色暗红，腰酸腰痛。于是在闺蜜的陪伴下，向德叔求治。
德叔解谜——气滞血瘀，寒凝胞宫
痛经的病机主要为冲任气血运行不畅，经血流通受阻，以致“不通则痛”或冲任子宫失于濡养而“不荣而痛”。小敏平日嗜食寒凉，寒湿伤于下焦、客于胞中，经血因寒湿凝滞，溢泻不畅而痛经，伴有腹胀、手脚冰凉、腰酸等不适。加之小敏经常熬夜，滋养不了肝血，发为血之余，便易出现脱发。治疗上，德叔采用温脾肾之阳，养肝血，佐以疏肝调经止痛。小敏服用中药1周后，手脚冰凉明显缓解，痛经也缓解了。
预防保健——穴位养生，激发阳气
冬至已至。冬至之前地表尚有“积热”，冬至之后则是真正寒冬。小敏这类痛经的“冰美人”应做到“三暖”：头暖、背暖和足暖。冬至是阴阳二气自然转化之时，此时艾灸、按摩或拍打神阙、大椎、至阳、足三里等穴位，可激发身体阳气，驱逐体内寒气，保持身体、手足温暖并增强体质，预防疾病。也可于冬至前后四天，用艾条灸神阙穴(将艾条点燃后，以肚脐为中心，由远至近转圈熏灼肚脐周围)。注意不要灼伤皮肤，艾灸时有温热感即可。每天一次，每次15分钟～20分钟。
德叔养生药膳房——
圆肉红枣饮
材料：当归15克，桑寄生15克，桂圆肉30克，红枣(去核)2-3枚。
功效：温经散寒补肝肾。
烹制方法：上述食材清洗干净后，加入清水750毫升(约3碗水量)，武火煮沸后改文火煮40分钟，代茶饮。此为1-2人量。
提示：每次月经干净后第三天连续服用3-5天。
当归羊肉煲
材料：羊肉300克，山药(鲜品)80克，当归15克，陈皮3克，红枣去核2-3枚，枸杞20克，生姜3-5片，精盐适量。
功效：温中散寒止痛。
烹制方法：诸物洗净，羊肉切块放入沸水中焯水备用，山药削皮切块备用；上述食材放入煲中，加清水1750毫升(约7碗水量)，武火煮沸后改文火煲1.5小时，加入适量精盐调味即可。此为2~3人量。（记者 林清清 通讯员 沈中）
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 大星彩票地图 |
